Home | Manual | Static Analysis | Playground
Cake - C23 and Beyond
-
Cake Static Analysis — Ownership & Nullable Contracts
- Introduction
-
Chapter 1: Nullable Pointers
-
The
_Optpointer annotation -
Enabling Nullable Rules:
#pragma nullable - Example 1: Assigning Nullable to a Non-Nullable Pointer
- Example 2: Converting Non-Nullable to Nullable
- Example 3: Nullable Pointer to a Non-Nullable Parameter
-
Helping the Analyzer with
assert() - Non-Nullable Initialization
-
Using
malloc()andcalloc()with Structs - Comparison with C# and TypeScript
-
The
- Chapter 2: Object Lifetime and Ownership
- Chapter 3: Parameter annotations
- Chapter 4: Flow Analysis and Object States
- Chapter 5: Known Limitations
- Chapter 6: Code Transition Strategy
- Quick Reference
- References
Cake Static Analysis — Ownership & Nullable Contracts
Last Updated: August 2026
A hands-on guide to Cake's ownership and nullable pointer annotations - with working examples, enforced rules, and an incremental migration strategy for existing codebases.
Introduction
Cake provides a set of contract annotations recognized by its static analyzer. With ownership annotations, you can achieve the same guarantees as C++ RAII and often stronger ones. Cake also introduces nullable pointer annotations, making it explicit when a pointer may be null and preventing mistakes like accidentally dereferencing a null pointer.
This manual walks you through each concept with working code examples, explains the rules enforced by the analyzer, and shows you how to adopt these features incrementally in an existing codebase.
Chapter 1: Nullable Pointers
The _Opt pointer annotation
The _Opt pointer annotation explicitly marks a pointer as nullable.
The absence of _Opt means the pointer is non-nullable.
The annotation is placed after the *.
For example, the following declaration says that strdup() accepts a non-nullable pointer and returns a nullable one:
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
A pointer without _Opt is always assumed to be non-nullable.
Enabling Nullable Rules: #pragma nullable
Because existing C code was not written with nullability in mind, Cake provides a pragma to control when the new rules apply:
// new rules apply: absence of _Opt = non-nullable
#pragma nullable enable
// Unannotated source: all unannotated pointers are nullable
#pragma nullable disable
This lets you migrate code incrementally enabling the rules file-by-file or region-by-region. Only static analysis behavior changes; the runtime behavior of your program is unaffected.
Example 1: Assigning Nullable to a Non-Nullable Pointer
Once nullable rules are enabled, assigning nullptr to an unqualified pointer generates a warning:
#pragma nullable enable
int main() {
int * p = nullptr; /* warning: p is non-nullable */
}
Example 2: Converting Non-Nullable to Nullable
Assigning a non-nullable pointer to a nullable variable is always safe and explicitly allowed:
#pragma nullable enable
char * get_name(); // returns non-nullable
int main() {
char * _Opt s = get_name(); // ok: widening to nullable
}
Example 3: Nullable Pointer to a Non-Nullable Parameter
Narrowing from nullable to non-nullable requires a null check. Without one, the analyzer warns you:
#pragma nullable enable
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
void f(char *s); // s is non-nullable
int main() {
char * _Opt s1 = strdup("a");
f(s1); /* warning: s1 may be null */
}
To fix this, add a null check before the call:
#pragma nullable enable
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
void f(char *s); // s is non-nullable
int main() {
char * _Opt s1 = strdup("a");
if (s1)
f(s1); // ok: flow analysis confirms s1 is not null here
}
Cake uses flow analysis to track possible nullability through branches. Once you check a pointer, the analyzer knows it is non-null inside the guarded block.
Helping the Analyzer with assert()
Because Cake's analysis is not inter-procedural, it cannot infer postconditions from called functions.
When the analyzer cannot determine a pointer's state on its own, you can hint with assert():
#pragma safety enable
struct X { int * _Opt data; };
bool is_empty(struct X * p) {
return p->data == nullptr;
}
void f(struct X * p) {
if (!is_empty(p)) {
assert(p->data != nullptr); // hint to the analyzer
*p->data = 1; // ok
}
}
From a flow analysis perspective, assert(expr) is equivalent to if (!(expr)) exit(1);.
Note: Be cautious: the problem with this approach is the separation between where the postcondition is established and where the assert is placed. If
is_emptychanges, it may invalidate the caller's assert.Note: A contract-based approach (postconditions declared alongside the function) is under development and will eventually replace the need for remote
assert()hints.
Non-Nullable Initialization
Non-nullable pointers can be initialized with {}, meaning they are set to zero; however,
they are still in an invalid state despite having a value.
This is very similar to being uninitialized. For instance:
#pragma nullable enable
struct X { char * text; };
struct X f() {
struct X x;
return x; // warning: returning uninitialized 'x.text'
}
Compare with:
#pragma nullable enable
struct X { char * text; };
struct X f() {
struct X x = {};
return x; // warning: returning possible null pointer 'x.text'
}
In both cases, the object is in an invalid state. In the first case, x.text is uninitialized (it has no defined value).
In the second case, x.text is initialized to zero (null), which is a defined value but still invalid for a non-nullable pointer.
#pragma nullable enable
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
struct X { char * text; };
void f() {
char * _Opt s = strdup("a");
if (s == nullptr)
return;
struct X x;
x.text = s; //ok
}
Using malloc() and calloc() with Structs
Cake understands the built-in semantics of malloc() and calloc() through the
_Uninitialized and _Clear pointee annotations declared on their return types:
void * _Owner _Opt _Uninitialized malloc(size_t size);
void * _Owner _Opt _Clear calloc(size_t nmemb, size_t size);
_Uninitialized(malloc()) — the returned pointee is uninitialized; every member must be assigned before use, exactly like a local variable declared without an initializer._Clear(calloc()) — the returned pointee is zero-initialized; non-nullable members start as null and must be assigned before passing to functions expecting non-nullable pointers.
#pragma nullable enable
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
void * _Owner _Opt _Uninitialized malloc(unsigned int sz);
struct X { char * text; };
void f() {
struct X * _Owner _Opt pX = malloc(sizeof *pX);
if (pX)
{
char * _Opt s = strdup("a");
if (s != nullptr){
pX->text = s; //ok
}
}
}
#pragma safety enable
char * _Opt strdup(const char * src);
void * _Owner _Opt _Clear calloc(unsigned int n, unsigned int sz);
void free(void * _Owner _Opt p);
struct X {
char * text; //non-nullable
};
void f0(struct X* p) { }
void f() {
struct X * _Owner _Opt pX = calloc(1, sizeof * pX);
if (pX)
{
f0(pX); //warning 33: non-nullable pointer 'pX.text' may be null
free(pX);
}
}
Comparison with C# and TypeScript
C#'s nullable reference types and TypeScript's strictNullChecks solve the same basic problem as
_Opt: absence of an explicit nullable annotation means non-nullable, and the compiler narrows a
variable's nullability after a check. The core mechanics are close enough that migrating mental
models between them is straightforward.
The two ecosystems diverge on power in different directions.
Cake's flow analysis tracks correlated facts within a function that C#/TS's narrowing does not
attempt — for example, proving a + b == 3 || a + b == 7 (never 5) after
if (c) { a = 1; b = 2; } else { a = 3; b = 4; }, by tracking which branch each value's alternative
originated from. C#/TS narrow nullability per variable; they don't correlate arithmetic or
relational facts across variables through a branch join at all.
What C#/TS have that Cake's nullability analysis does not yet have is interprocedural
reasoning. [NotNullWhen], [MaybeNullWhen], and TypeScript's type predicates and assertion
functions let a callee declare a postcondition that the caller's analysis picks up automatically.
Cake's nullability analysis is not inter-procedural today — it cannot infer what a called function
does to a pointer's nullability, so the same effect currently requires a manual assert() hint at
the call site (see Helping the Analyzer with assert(), above), with the attendant risk that the
hint goes stale if the callee's behavior changes. A [NotNullWhen]-equivalent for nullability is
planned; see the contract-based approach mentioned under Helping the Analyzer with assert().
Cake's ownership analysis, however, already has a working precedent for exactly this shape of
contract: _Ctor and _Dtor are postconditions declared on the function signature itself
(_Ctor — "every member will be initialized before I return"; _Dtor — "every _Owner member
will be released before I return"), checked against the callee's actual implementation, and
consumed automatically by every caller without a manual hint — the same shape as C#'s out
definite assignment (see Comparison with C#'s out parameters, Chapter 3). So the interprocedural
gap above is specific to nullability, not a limitation of Cake's flow analysis in general.
Chapter 2: Object Lifetime and Ownership
Object lifetime as the portion of program execution during which storage is reserved for that object. Cake's ownership system gives you compile-time enforcement of these rules.
Enabling Ownership Checks
// enables lifetime checks
#pragma ownership enable
// equivalent to: nullable enable + ownership enable
#pragma safety enable
Note:
_Ownerannotations are parsed even when ownership is disabled, but have no effect. Use#pragma safety enableas a shorthand for both features.
Owner References and the _Owner annotation
An owner reference is an object that manages the lifetime of the thing it references. The most common form is an owner pointer — a pointer to a heap-allocated object that is responsible for freeing it.
Declare an owner pointer by adding _Owner after the *:
#pragma safety enable
typedef int FILE;
FILE * _Owner _Opt fopen( const char *filename, const char *mode );
void fclose(FILE * _Owner p); /* p is not nullable */
int main() {
FILE * _Owner _Opt f = fopen("file.txt", "r");
if (f)
fclose(f); /* ownership is transferred to fclose */
}
If you comment out fclose(), the analyzer warns that f leaves scope without its ownership being transferred:
} // warning: 'f' leaves scope with an owned resource
The Two Core Ownership Rules
Rule: An owner reference is always the unique owner of the referenced object. Copying an owner reference transfers ownership to the destination.
Rule: Before the end of its lifetime, an owner reference must move ownership of the objects it owns.
Ownership transfer happens through assignment or by passing the owner as a function argument. Calling fclose(f) is exactly like assigning f to fclose's parameter — the callee takes ownership:
FILE * _Owner _Opt f2 = f; // ownership transferred: f is now 'moved'
if (f2) fclose(f2); // f2's ownership transferred to fclose
Additional Owner Rules
Rule: Owner objects cannot be discarded. Calling
fopen()and ignoring the return value is an error.
fopen("file.txt", "r"); // warning: discarding owner return value
Rule: A non-owner object cannot be copied to an owner object.
Rule: The null pointer constant can be used to initialize owner objects (it represents an empty owner).
Non-Pointer Owner References
Ownership is not limited to pointers. Berkeley sockets, for example, use an integer file descriptor. You can mark any type as an owner:
_Owner int server_socket = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
/* ... */
close(server_socket);
Note: The
_Ownerannotation belongs to the storage holding the reference, not to the pointed-to type. Its placement follows the same rules asconst.
View References
A view reference accesses an object without managing its lifetime. Regular (non-_Owner)
pointers are view references by default. The _View annotation is used on struct types,
not on pointer declarations.
Rule: The lifetime of the referenced object must exceed the lifetime of the view reference.
The analyzer detects when a view pointer outlives what it points to:
struct X { int i; };
int main()
{
struct X * _Opt p = nullptr;
{
struct X x = {};
p = &x;
}
p->i = 1; // warning: 'x' lifetime ended
static_debug(p);
}
The _View annotation
The _View annotation enables assignment without ownership transfer.
A _View object does not own the resource.
#pragma safety enable
struct X { char * _Owner _Opt text; };
void f(_View struct X x) { /* read-only access, no ownership */ }
void free(void* _Owner _Opt p);
int main() {
struct X x = {};
f(x); /* not moved */
_View struct X x2 = x; /* not moved */
free(x.text); /* x is the owner */
}
Deleting Owner Pointers
Owner pointers take responsibility for both the pointed-to object and its storage.
A common pattern is to implement a delete function that releases both:
#pragma safety enable
#include <stdlib.h>
struct X { char * _Owner text; };
void x_delete(struct X * _Owner _Opt p) {
if (p) {
free(p->text);
free(p); /* storage */
}
}
Note:
void * _Ownerowns only the storage.Note: Converting
T * _Ownertovoid * _Ownerrequires the pointed-to object to be empty first. This is how the analyzer distinguishes between moving the object and moving only the raw storage.
Comparison with C++ RAII
RAII is a pattern, not a static check: a constructor/destructor pair runs automatically at
scope exit, but nothing verifies that a raw resource outside such a wrapper was released.
T* p = new T; with no matching delete compiles without complaint in C++. The guarantee only
exists for types that actually implement it.
Cake's _Owner takes the opposite approach: it enforces the same discipline directly on ordinary
pointers and values, without requiring a wrapper type. Leaving scope with an unmoved _Owner
is a compile-time warning, not a convention you have to trust. The fopen/fclose example earlier
in this chapter is exactly the RAII pattern, but checked by the analyzer instead of relying
on a class to run the cleanup.
The two approaches provide different guarantees. RAII executes the destructor automatically at scope exit. Cake's Ctor/Dtor are contracts that the analyzer verifies were fulfilled, but no code is generated to call them automatically. As a result, there are code paths that RAII would still clean up automatically, whereas Cake relies on the analyzer being able to verify that the required cleanup was written.
Cake also proves the ownership rules statically, with no runtime overhead. std::unique_ptr,
which is the closest analog to _Owner (single, move-only ownership), still performs a runtime
check in its destructor. After a move, its internal pointer is set to null so that delete ptr;
becomes a no-op.
Every destructor therefore executes a null check, whether or not the object was ever moved from.
Cake proves the equivalent fact "this owner still holds something to release" ahead of time by tracking
ownership and moved/null state through flow analysis, so no unconditional runtime check needs to be emitted.
When the analyzer cannot prove that an owner is null, an explicit if (ptr) provides the missing proof,
allowing the cleanup to be verified while keeping the common case free of unnecessary runtime checks.
Chapter 3: Parameter annotations
The _Dtor parameter annotation
_Dtor tells the analyzer that the function will move out all owner contents of
the pointed-to struct, leaving it uninitialized. The compiler also verifies that the
implementation fulfills this contract.
#pragma safety enable
#include <stdlib.h>
struct X { char * _Owner _Opt text; };
void x_destroy(_Dtor struct X * x) {
free(x->text); // moves x->text; contract fulfilled
}
int main() {
struct X x = {};
/* ... */
x_destroy(&x); // contents of x are now moved
}
Note:
_Dtoris implicitly_Opton every member it reaches — the pointee is only guaranteed to be partially constructed, so each member is treated as possibly-null regardless of its own declared nullability. This lets_Dtoraccept an object that failed halfway through initialization. It does not excuse the callee from releasing a member that does turn out to be non-null: the caller is excused from that release (its ownership ends at the call), so the callee must actually do it, typically behind anif (x->member) ...guard.
You can build a delete function on top of x_destroy:
void x_delete(_Opt struct X * _Owner _Opt p) {
if (p) {
x_destroy(p); // moves *p's contents
free(p); // releases storage
}
}
The _Clear parameter annotation
_Clear tells the analyzer that the function will zero out every member of the pointed-to
struct before returning. The compiler verifies that the implementation fulfills this contract —
each member must be provably zero at every exit point:
#pragma safety enable
struct X { int a; int b; };
void zero_out(_Clear struct X* p) {
p->a = 0;
p->b = 0; // both members must be zero at exit
}
Omitting a member (or leaving it possibly non-zero) is a warning:
void zero_out(_Clear struct X* p) {
p->a = 0;
// p->b never touched
} // warning: _Clear parameter 'p' pointee (.b) is not zero at exit
_Clear follows the same placement rules as _Ctor/_Dtor: it annotates the pointee, not the
pointer, and the pointee cannot also be const (the callee has to write it).
The _Ctor parameter annotation
_Ctor is the inverse of _Dtor. It tells the analyzer that the
function expects an uninitialized object as input and initializes it
on return. This is the pattern for init-style functions.
#pragma safety enable
#include <string.h>
struct X { char * _Owner _Opt text; };
int init(_Ctor struct X *p, const char * text) {
p->text = strdup(text); // safe: p->text is uninitialized
}
int main() {
struct X x;
init(&x, "hello"); // x is fully initialized after this
free(x.text);
}
Contrast this with a setter, which operates on an already-initialized object and must free the old value first:
#pragma safety enable
#include <string.h>
struct X { char * _Owner _Opt text; };
int set(struct X *p, const char * text) {
// old value must be released
//free(p->text);
p->text = strdup(text);
}
Comparison with C#'s out parameters
_Ctor looks like C#'s out: both let the callee receive storage the caller has not initialized,
on the understanding that the callee will initialize it. C#'s out is backed by definite
assignment — the compiler rejects any code path in the callee that returns without assigning the
out parameter — and _Ctor is checked the same way, against the implementation, not just assumed:
#pragma safety enable
char* _Owner _Opt strdup(const char* src);
struct X { char* _Owner _Opt text; };
void x_init_forgot(_Ctor struct X* p) {
/* p->text is never written */
} // warning: _Ctor parameter 'p' pointee (.text) is possibly not initialized at exit
Unlike _Dtor — which only obligates _Owner members, since a plain scalar has no lifetime to end
— _Ctor covers every member of the pointee, the same breadth as out. Leaving a non-_Owner
field untouched is just as much a violation as leaving an _Owner one uninitialized, because the
caller is trusting that the whole object is now well-formed, not only its owned resources:
#pragma safety enable
char* _Owner _Opt strdup(const char* src);
struct X { char* _Owner _Opt text; int i; };
void x_init(_Ctor struct X* p) {
p->text = strdup("hello");
p->i = 0;
} // ok: every member initialized
void x_init_partial(_Ctor struct X* p) {
p->text = strdup("hello");
/* p->i never touched */
} // warning: _Ctor parameter 'p' pointee (.i) is possibly not initialized at exit
Type Annotations in Arrays parameters
In C, array types in arguments are pointers. This characteristics is preserved.
To use the owner annotation in an array we do. (Just like const)
#pragma safety enable
void free(void * _Owner _Opt p);
void f(int a[_Owner])
{
free(a);
}
But I think this is quite uncommon.
Chapter 4: Flow Analysis and Object States
Flow analysis is the foundation of Cake's nullable and ownership checks. It tracks the possible states of every variable at every point in your program.
Enabling Flow Analysis
#pragma flow enable // standalone
#pragma safety enable // enables flow automatically
// or compile with: -fanalyzer
The State Model
The analyzer tracks the following states for each variable:
uninitialized — the variable has been declared but not yet assigned a value.
moved — ownership was transferred to another variable or passed into a function call.
null — the pointer is null, or the owner holds no resource.
not-null — the pointer is known to reference a live object.
zero — the value of a non-pointer object is zero. This is distinct from null because, for non-pointer owners like sockets, zero does not necessarily mean "no resource".
not-zero — the value of a non-pointer object is non-zero.
lifetime-ended — the object the pointer was referencing has gone out of scope.
Note:
uninitialized,moved, andlifetime-endedare imaginary states: they exist in flow analysis but not at runtime, and have no corresponding value in memory. The other states (null,not-null,zero,not-zero) describe something actually stored in the variable. But nothing at runtime is "uninitialized," "moved," or "lifetime-ended" — the bits sitting in memory are just bits (a moved-from or lifetime-ended pointer can still hold a perfectly valid-looking address). These states exist only so the analyzer can track what it knows: that no meaningful value has been given yet, that the variable is no longer accountable for the value it held, or that the object it once pointed to is no longer around.
Inspecting State with static_debug
Use this built-in declaration to inspect a variable's tracked state during development:
#pragma safety enable
int main() {
int a;
static_debug(a); // prints state to compiler output
}
Proving Facts with compile_assert
compile_assert(expr) asks the analyzer to prove expr using only what it already knows at that
point — across every value alternative the flow tracker has recorded, not just one possible path.
If it can't prove expr on every alternative, it warns:
#pragma safety enable
void f(int c) {
int a, b;
if (c) { a = 1; b = 2; } else { a = 3; b = 4; }
compile_assert(a + b == 3 || a + b == 7); // ok: true on every path
compile_assert(a + b == 3); // warning: false on the c==0 path
}
Unlike assert() and runtime_assert(), compile_assert is purely a compile-time check:
- It generates no code and has no runtime effect — the condition is never evaluated. It exists only for the analyzer.
- It does not narrow later state.
assert()/runtime_assert()discard the branches where the condition is false, so the analyzer treats it as proven from that point on;compile_assertdoes not — it only reports whether the fact is already provable, and leaves the tracked state untouched either way:
#pragma safety enable
void f(int* _Opt p) {
compile_assert(p != 0); // warning: not provable here (p could be null)
*p = 1; // warning: possible null pointer dereference (unaffected by the assert above)
}
Because of this, compile_assert is mainly a development and regression-testing tool: use it to
pin down exactly what the analyzer can currently prove at a given point, and to catch the analyzer
regressing on a previously-provable fact. Prefer assert()/runtime_assert() in real code where
you actually want to establish a fact for the analysis (and the runtime) going forward.
Uninitialized State
Reading an uninitialized variable triggers a warning. This also applies after a move:
int * _Owner p = f();
free(p); // p is now uninitialized (moved into free)
free(p); // warning: p is uninitialized
Moved State
When you assign an owner to another owner in local scope, the source enters the moved state. The analyzer knows the pointed-to object is still valid but the source no longer owns it:
int * _Owner p = f();
int * _Owner _Opt p2 = 0;
p2 = p; // p is now 'moved'
free(p); // warning: p was moved
free(p2); // ok
Null and Not-Null States
After a null check, the analyzer refines the state inside each branch:
void * _Owner _Opt p = malloc(1);
if (p) {
compile_assert(p != 0); // ok: provable inside the check
}
free(p);
Chapter 5: Known Limitations
Backward goto Is Not Analyzed as a Loop
Unlike while/for, which run a two-pass analysis to approximate repeated execution, a label is
visited only once, in top-to-bottom order. A backward goto (jumping to a label above it) does not
re-trigger analysis of the label's body, so the analyzer under-approximates what the jump can do:
#pragma safety enable
void f(int n) {
int a = 0;
L:
a = a + 1;
if (n > 0) {
n = n - 1;
goto L;
}
// Expected (sound): a is an unbounded value, since the loop can run any
// number of times.
// Actual (today): a is seen as exactly 1, as if the backward jump had
// no effect on the analysis.
compile_assert(a == 1);
}
Workaround: Prefer
while/forover backwardgotowhere possible; those constructs get the full two-pass loop analysis.
Pointer Equality Between Distinct Pointers
Two unrelated pointers may still compare equal at runtime, but the analyzer currently treats a
concrete (synthetic) pointer value as foldable, so p == q for two distinct pointees folds to
always-false and the true branch is (incorrectly) treated as dead:
#pragma safety enable
void ptr_eq(int* _Opt p, int* _Opt q) {
if (p == q) {
// This branch is reachable at runtime and must still be analyzed,
// but flow3 currently folds the comparison to always-false here.
if (p) {
compile_assert(p != 0);
}
}
}
Note: Comparisons against the literal
0/nullptrare unaffected — only two non-constant pointer operands trigger this.
These are implementation constraints, not flaws in the ownership model itself.
Chapter 6: Code Transition Strategy
Adopting Cake's static analysis in an existing codebase does not require a big-bang migration. The recommended approach is incremental:
Create
safe.h— define all Cake extensions (_Owner,_Opt,_View,_Dtor,_Ctor,compile_assert,static_debug) as empty macros. This lets your code compile cleanly with a standard C compiler before you begin annotating.Enable nullable rules one file at a time — add
#pragma nullable enableto one translation unit, fix its warnings, then move to the next.Enable ownership rules — once nullable warnings are clean in a file, add
#pragma ownership enable(or#pragma safety enable).Annotate signatures progressively — add
_Owner,_Opt,_Ctor, and_Dtorannotations as you work through each file. The pragma-controlled rollout ensures you always have a compiling codebase.
Quick Reference
Type Annotations
_Opt — the pointer may be null (nullable). Without this type annotation, a pointer is treated as non-nullable when nullable rules are enabled.
_Owner — the reference manages the lifetime of the object it references. Ownership is transferred on assignment or when passed to a function.
_View on struct — strips _Owner from all members for the duration of that variable's scope. Used to pass an owner struct without transferring ownership.
_Ctor — the parameter must be uninitialized on entry; the function is responsible for initializing it before returning.
_Dtor — the parameter must be fully initialized on entry; the function is responsible for moving out all owner contents before returning.
_Clear — the function is responsible for setting every member of the pointee to zero before returning. Also used on a function's return type (e.g. calloc()) to describe an already zero-initialized pointee.
_Uninitialized — marks the pointee as uninitialized. Used on a function's return type (e.g. malloc()) to describe a freshly allocated, uninitialized pointee.
Pragmas
#pragma nullable enable / #pragma nullable disable — toggles non-nullable enforcement. When enabled, any pointer without _Opt is treated as non-nullable.
#pragma ownership enable — enables owner reference lifetime checks.
#pragma safety enable — enables both nullable and ownership checks at once. Equivalent to combining both pragmas above.
#pragma flow enable — enables flow analysis without enabling nullable or ownership rules.
Built-in Intrinsics
compile_assert(expr) — asks the analyzer to prove expr from what it currently knows; warns if it can't. Purely compile-time — no runtime effect, and it does not narrow later state.
static_debug(var) — prints var's current state to the compiler output. Use this to explore what the analyzer knows about a variable.
References
- C# Nullable References: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/nullable-references
- C# Nullable Migration Strategies: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/nullable-migration-strategies
- TypeScript Type Predicates: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/advanced-types.html#using-type-predicates
- Microsoft SAL: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/code-quality/understanding-sal
- C#
outparameter: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/keywords/out - C# Nullable Analysis Attributes: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/attributes/nullable-analysis